Christchurch Press 4 December 2010: Section G, Page 12
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 4 December 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 4 December 2010.
Page 12 of section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 September 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 December 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 September 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 2 October 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 6 November 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 9 October 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 13 November 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 30 October 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 27 November 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 23 October 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 16 October 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 20 November 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 11 September 2010.
Page 12 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 11 December 2010.
This paper presents the probabilistic seismic performance and loss assessment of an actual bridge– foundation–soil system, the Fitzgerald Avenue twin bridges in Christchurch, New Zealand. A two-dimensional finite element model of the longitudinal direction of the system is modelled using advanced soil and structural constitutive models. Ground motions at multiple levels of intensity are selected based on the seismic hazard deaggregation at the site. Based on rigorous examination of several deterministic analyses, engineering demand parameters (EDP’s), which capture the global and local demand, and consequent damage to the bridge and foundation are determined. A probabilistic seismic loss assessment of the structure considering both direct repair and loss of functionality consequences was performed to holistically assess the seismi risk of the system. It was found that the non-horizontal stratification of the soils, liquefaction, and soil–structure interaction had pronounced effects on the seismic demand distribution of the bridge components, of which the north abutment piles and central pier were critical in the systems seismic performance. The consequences due to loss of functionality of the bridge during repair were significantly larger than the direct repair costs, with over a 2% in 50 year probability of the total loss exceeding twice the book-value of the structure.