
The Catholic Cathedral is classified as a category 1 listed heritage building constructed largely of unreinforced stone masonry, and was significantly damaged in the recent Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011. In the 2010 event the building presented slight to moderta damage, meanwhile in the 2011 one experienced ground shaking in excess of its capacity leading to block failures and partial collapse of parts of the building, which left the building standing but still posing a significant hazard. In this paper we discuss the approach to develop the earthquake analysis of the building by 3D numerical simulations, and the results are compared/calibrated with the observed damage of the 2010 earthquake. Very accurate records were obtained during both earthquakes due to a record station located least than 80 m of distance from the building and used in the simulations. Moreover it is included in the model the soil structure interaction because it was observed that the ground and foundation played an important role on the seismic behavior of the structure. A very good agreement was found between the real observed damage and the nonlinear dynamic simulations described trough inelastic deformation (cracking) and building´s performance.
Today (04/09/14) marks the fourth anniversary since the first earthquake rocked the city and greater Christchurch area. That first quake was magnitude 7.1, and luckily there was only one fatality (possible a heart attack). Since then we have had over 14,000 quakes, most very small in magnitude, but well over 500 of magnitude 4 or greater. 5...
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 7 April 2014.
Page 7 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 1 April 2014.
Page 1 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 7 April 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 1 April 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 1 May 2014.
Page 7 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 March 2014.
Page 7 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 March 2014.
Page 7 of Section F of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 March 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 7 March 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 1 September 2014.
Page 7 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 November 2014.
Page 7 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 1 May 2014.
Page 7 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 November 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 1 December 2014.
Page 7 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 1 October 2014.
Page 1 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 October 2014.
Page 7 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 1 December 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 October 2014.
Page 7 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 November 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 November 2014.
Page 7 of Section F of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 November 2014.
Page 1 of Section B of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 January 2014.
Page 7 of Section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 February 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 February 2014.
Page 7 of Section H of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 February 2014.
Page 7 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 1 February 2014.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 7 January 2014.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 1 August 2014.