QuakeStory 202
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
A story submitted by Elizabeth to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Elizabeth to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Robyna Smith to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Katie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Rachel to the QuakeStories website.
Buildings subject to earthquake shaking will tend to move not only horizontally but also rotate in plan. In-plan rotation is known as “building torsion” and it may occur for a variety of reasons, including stiffness and strength eccentricity and/or torsional effects from ground motions. Methods to consider torsion in structural design standards generally involve analysis of the structure in its elastic state. This is despite the fact that the structural elements can yield, thereby significantly altering the building response and the structural element demands. If demands become too large, the structure may collapse. While a number of studies have been conducted into the behavior of structures considering inelastic building torsion, there appears to be no consensus that one method is better than another and as a result, provisions within current design standards have not adopted recent proposals in the literature. However, the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission recently made the recommendation that provisions to account for inelastic torsional response of buildings be introduced within New Zealand building standards. Consequently, this study examines how and to what extent the torsional response due to system eccentricity may affect the seismic performance of a building and considers what a simple design method should account for. It is concluded that new methods should be simple, be applicable to both the elastic and inelastic range of response, consider bidirectional excitation and include guidance for multi-story systems.
A story submitted by Susan to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Andrew to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mary to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Phoebe to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Jo to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Dave to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Bertha and Robert Tobias to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Danielle to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Nathanael Boehm to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Sarah Gallagher to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Selena to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Scott to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 24 June 2011 entitled, "My 'be prepared' bag...".
A story submitted by Brendan Evans to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Wendy Everingham to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 2 March 2011 entitled, "Random things".
A story submitted by Jennifer to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ailsa to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mark Darbyshire to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Liza Rossie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by J Bell to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Sharon Stevens to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Nicky Taylor to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Rosie Belton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Tim Kerr to the QuakeStories website.