Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Aftermath of the earthquake in Christchurch where the cleanup has begun. Historic buildings around Christchurch received varying degrees of damage".
There are many swaths of land that are deemed unsuitable to build on and occupy. These places, however, are rarely within an established city. The Canterbury earthquakes of 2010 and 2011 left areas in central Christchurch with such significant land damage that it is unlikely to be re-inhabited for a considerable period of time. These areas are commonly known as the ‘Red Zone’.This thesis explores redevelop in on volatile land through innovative solutions found and adapted from the traditional Indonesian construction techniques. Currently, Indonesia’s vernacular architecture sits on the verge of extinction after a cultural shift towards the masonry bungalow forced a rapid decline in their occupation and construction. The 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami illustrated the bungalows’ poor performance in the face of catastrophic seismic activity, being outperformed by the traditional structures. This has been particularly evident in the Rumah Aceh construction of the Aceh province in Northern Sumatra. Within a New Zealand context an adaptation and modernisation of the Rumah Aceh construction will generate an architectural response not currently accepted under the scope of NZS 3604:2011; the standards most recent revision following the Canterbury earthquake of 2010 concerning timber-based seismic performance. This architectural exploration will further address light timber structures, their components, sustainability and seismic resilience. Improving new builds’ durability as New Zealand moves away from the previously promoted bungalow model that extends beyond residential and into all aspects of New Zealand built environment.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 28 March 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 4 January 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 5 March 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 4 January 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 28 March 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 7 February 2013.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 4 January 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 23 August 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 24 May 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 24 May 2015.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 24 June 2013.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 23 August 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 7 February 2013.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 5 March 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 25 May 2015.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 1 June 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 1 June 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Cathedral Square on 24 June 2013.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken in Victoria Square on 4 January 2014.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken near Peacock's Gallop, Sumner on 6 October 2011.
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Aftermath of the earthquake in Christchurch where the cleanup has begun. Historic buildings around Christchurch received varying degrees of damage. Christchurch Cathedral".
Photograph captioned by Fairfax, "Aftermath of the earthquake in Christchurch where the cleanup has begun. Historic buildings around Christchurch received varying degrees of damage. Christchurch Cathedral".
A photograph captioned by BeckerFraserPhotos, "A view looking across the Avon River from Avonside Drive to River Road shows the degree of road subsidence".
In the late 1960s the Wellington City Council surveyed all the commercial buildings in the city and marked nearly 200 as earthquake prone. The owners were given 15 years to either strengthen or demolish their buildings. The end result was mass demolition throughout the seventies and eighties.¹ Prompted by the Christchurch earthquakes, once again the council has published a list of over 630 earthquake prone buildings that need to be strengthened or demolished by 2030.²Of these earthquake prone buildings, the majority were built between 1880 and 1930, with 125 buildings appearing on the Wellington City Council Heritage Building List.³ This list accounts for a significant proportion of character buildings in the city. There is a danger that the aesthetic integrity of our city will be further damaged due to the urgent need to strengthen these buildings. Many of the building owners are resistant because of the high cost. By adapting these buildings to house co-workspaces, we can gain more than just the retention of the building’s heritage. The seismic upgrade provides the opportunity for the office space to be redesigned to suit changes in the ways we work. Through a design-based research approach this thesis proposes a framework that clarifies the process of adapting Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings to accommodate co-working. This framework deals with the key concepts of program, structure and heritage. The framework is tested on one of Wellington’s earthquake prone heritage buildings, the Wellington Working Men’s Club, in order to demonstrate what can be gained from this strengthening process. ¹ Reid, J., “Hometown Boomtown,” in NZ On Screen (Wellington, 1983). ² Wellington City Council, List of Earthquake Prone Buildings as at 06/03/2017. (Wellington: Absolutely Positively Wellington. 2017). ³ ibid.
A graphic for an article about Gerald Shirtcliff.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in HTML5 format. The photograph was taken at the Lyttelton Anglican Cemetery on 6 October 2011.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in SWF format. The photograph was taken in Latimer Square, near Gloucester Street on 9 June 2012.
A zip file of an interactive 360-degree panoramic photograph in SWF format. The photograph was taken in Latimer Square, near Hereford Street on 4 January 2014.