Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
Photo of damage of Aoraki Building taken by Marcus Langman, 10 March 2011.
view to some of the damage in the distance and the building that might be demolished - brick seven storey building - i've always liked this one : ( .
The damaged Christ's College Rowing Club building at Kerrs Reach. The building has visibly slumped to one side. The photographer comments, "This is the sad state of the building after 3 earthquakes has caused the rowing club to sink like a leaky boat".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 24 September 2012 entitled, "'Bandoned Books?".
The M7.1 Darfield earthquake shook the town of Christchurch (New Zealand) in the early morning on Saturday 4th September 2010 and caused damage to a number of heritage unreinforced masonry buildings. No fatalities were reported directly linked to the earthquake, but the damage to important heritage buildings was the most extensive to have occurred since the 1931 Hawke‟s Bay earthquake. In general, the nature of damage was consistent with observations previously made on the seismic performance of unreinforced masonry buildings in large earthquakes, with aspects such as toppled chimneys and parapets, failure of gables and poorly secured face-loaded walls, and in-plane damage to masonry frames all being extensively documented. This report on the performance of the unreinforced masonry buildings in the 2010 Darfield earthquake provides details on typical building characteristics, a review of damage statistics obtained by interrogating the building assessment database that was compiled in association with post-earthquake building inspections, and a review of the characteristic failure modes that were observed
Modern methods of seismic design (since the 1970s) allow structural engineers to design new buildings with the aim of predictable and ductile behaviour in severe earthquakes, in order to prevent collapse and loss of life. However some controlled damage is expected, which may result in the building being damaged beyond economic repair after severe shaking. Seismic protection of structures has seen significant advances in recent decades, due to the development of new technologies and advanced materials. It has only been recently recognised world-wide that it is possible to design economical structures which can resist severe earthquakes with limited or negligible structural damage. There are two alternative ways of designing buildings to avoid permanent damage in severe earthquakes; base isolation and damage-resistant design. Base isolation requires the building to be separated from the ground by isolation devices which can dissipate energy. This is proven technology which may add a little to the initial cost of the building, but will prove to be less expensive in the long term. Damage-resistant design is developing rapidly, in several different forms. These include rocking walls or rocking frames, with or without post-tensioning, and a variety of energy dissipating devices attached to the building in different ways. If not already the case, damage-resistant design will soon become no more expensive than conventional design for new buildings.
Damaged building in St Albans.
Damaged building in St Albans.
Damage to buildings down Victoria Street. Members of the public have walked inside the police tape cordon to have a look at the damaged buildings and bricks across the road.
None
During the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes, Reinforced Concrete Frame with Masonry Infill (RCFMI) buildings were subjected to significant lateral loads. A survey conducted by Christchurch City Council (CCC) and the Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Authority (CERA) documented 10,777 damaged buildings, which included building characteristics (building address, the number of storeys, the year of construction, and building use) and post-earthquake damage observations (building safety information, observed damage, level of damage, and current state of the buildings). This data was merged into the Canterbury Earthquake Building Assessment (CEBA) database and was utilised to generate empirical fragility curves using the lognormal distribution method. The proposed fragility curves were expected to provide a reliable estimation of the mean vulnerability for commercial RCFMI buildings in the region http://www.13thcms.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Symposium-Info-and-Presentation-Schedule.pdf VoR - Version of Record
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.
A photograph of the earthquake damage to the Fisher's Building.