Christchurch Press 18 July 2012: Section A, Page 4
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 18 July 2012.
Page 4 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 18 July 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 3 August 2012.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 8 August 2012.
The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission has tried to determine exactly who should have put a cordon around a central Christchurch building identified as an earthquake risk.
A man whose wife was killed when the CTV building collapsed says the council's inspections after the September quake were in a mess and signage put on some buildings sent the wrong message that they were safe to occupy.
Witnesses before the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission have been questioned about why a building known to be earthquake prone was allowed to reopen, despite several red flags.
Page 15 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 23 June 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 13 July 2012.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 12 December 2012.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 8 August 2012.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 1 August 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 8 March 2012.
Two engineers who prepared a critical report on the CTV building spent much of the day yesterday defending their expertise and credentials at the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 30 June 2012.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 13 December 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 7 September 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 8 September 2012.
A PDF copy of The Star newspaper, published on Friday 13 July 2012.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 9 August 2012.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 7 March 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 17 July 2012.
The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission has heard that evidence crucial to working out what caused the collapse of the Canterbury Television Building, was destroyed by the firm which oversaw its design.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 6 September 2012.
An earthquake engineer says designing buildings to resist earthquakes is as much an art as it is a science and you can never make a structure completely quake-proof.
Page 2 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 26 June 2012.
A PDF copy of The Star newspaper, published on Friday 10 August 2012.
Page 3 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Tuesday 4 December 2012.
Page 5 of Section A of the Christchurch edition of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 18 August 2012.
The Anglican Church has been asked why it failed to carry out a detailed inspection of a building which partially collapsed, killing a Canadian tourist in Christchurch during the February earthquake.
The Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission has heard the earthquake resilience of stairways in the Forsyth Barr building was compromised when they were installed.