A story submitted by Jeffrey Paparoa Holman to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Francis Ganderton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Marian Parkin to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Denise to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Leonie to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Lisa Gibson to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mrs B. to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Rachel to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Ashley Hitt-Schultz to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Owen to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Anonymous to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Keryn to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Bernice to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Helen to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Aaron Schulz to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Hamish to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Berwyn to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by H.B. to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Irene to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Scott to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Mike Williams to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Malcolm to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Deborah Fitchett's blog for 27 September 2010, posted to Livejournal. The entry is titled, "In which she has almost certainly applied for a job".The entry was downloaded on 14 April 2015.
An entry from Deborah Fitchett's blog for 27 September 2010, posted to Dreamwidth. The entry is titled, "In which she has almost certainly applied for a job".The entry was downloaded on 17 April 2015.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 4 September 2013 entitled, "We've been living our new life post earthquake for three years now....".
A plan which outlined the scope, approach and key deliverables for communications and stakeholder engagement for SCIRT.
Buildings subject to earthquake shaking will tend to move not only horizontally but also rotate in plan. In-plan rotation is known as “building torsion” and it may occur for a variety of reasons, including stiffness and strength eccentricity and/or torsional effects from ground motions. Methods to consider torsion in structural design standards generally involve analysis of the structure in its elastic state. This is despite the fact that the structural elements can yield, thereby significantly altering the building response and the structural element demands. If demands become too large, the structure may collapse. While a number of studies have been conducted into the behavior of structures considering inelastic building torsion, there appears to be no consensus that one method is better than another and as a result, provisions within current design standards have not adopted recent proposals in the literature. However, the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission recently made the recommendation that provisions to account for inelastic torsional response of buildings be introduced within New Zealand building standards. Consequently, this study examines how and to what extent the torsional response due to system eccentricity may affect the seismic performance of a building and considers what a simple design method should account for. It is concluded that new methods should be simple, be applicable to both the elastic and inelastic range of response, consider bidirectional excitation and include guidance for multi-story systems.
Seismic isolation is an effective technology for significantly reducing damage to buildings and building contents. However, its application to light-frame wood buildings has so far been unable to overcome cost and technical barriers such as susceptibility to movement during high-wind loading. The precursor to research in the field of isolation of residential buildings was the 1994 Northridge Earthquake (6.7 MW) in the United States and the 1995 Kobe Earthquake (6.9 MW) in Japan. While only a small number of lives were lost in residential buildings in these events, the economic impact was significant with over half of earthquake recovery costs given to repair and reconstruction of residential building damage. A value case has been explored to highlight the benefits of seismically isolated residential buildings compared to a standard fixed-base dwellings for the Wellington region. Loss data generated by insurance claim information from the 2011 Christchurch Earthquake has been used by researchers to determine vulnerability functions for the current light-frame wood building stock. By further considering the loss attributed to drift and acceleration sensitive components, and a simplified single degree of freedom (SDOF) building model, a method for determining vulnerability functions for seismic isolated buildings was developed. Vulnerability functions were then applied directly in a loss assessment using the GNS developed software, RiskScape. Vulnerability was shown to dramatically reduce for isolated buildings compared to an equivalent fixed-base building and as a result, the monetary savings in a given earthquake scenario were significant. This work is expected to drive further interest for development of solutions for the seismic isolation of residential dwellings, of which one option is further considered and presented herein.
This poster discusses several possible approaches by which the nonlinear response of surficial soils can be explicitly modelled in physics-based ground motion simulations, focusing on the relative advantages and limitations of the various methodologies. These methods include fully-coupled 3D simulation models that directly allow soil nonlinearity in surficial soils, the domain reduction method for decomposing the physical domain into multiple subdomains for separate simulation, conventional site response analysis uncoupled from the simulations, and finally, the use of simple empirically based site amplification factors We provide the methodology for an ongoing study to explicitly incorporate soil nonlinearity into hybrid broadband simulations of the 2010-2011 Canterbury, New Zealand earthquakes.
A diagram which illustrates the numbers of people trained to July 2016.