A PDF copy of a summary report of All Right? research findings. The report was created in February 2015
A PDF copy of a summary report of All Right? research findings. The report was created in February 2017
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner. The infographic asks a question beginning with 'What could you do', and gives three ideas for improving personal wellbeing.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner in March 2014. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right? about wellbeing in Canterbury.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner in March 2014. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right? about wellbeing in Canterbury.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner. The infographic asks a question beginning with 'What could you do', and gives three ideas for improving personal wellbeing.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner in March 2014. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right? about wellbeing in Canterbury.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner. The infographic asks a question beginning with 'What could you do', and gives three ideas for improving personal wellbeing.
An All Right? infographic designed for use on Facebook. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right?.
An All Right? infographic designed for use on Facebook. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right?.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner. The infographic asks a question beginning with 'What could you do', and gives three ideas for improving personal wellbeing.
A PDF copy of a summary of qualitative research findings on young people in Christchurch. The report was prepared by the Community and Public Health Information Team in December 2013, to inform the All Right? wellbeing campaign.
An All Right? infographic designed for use on Facebook. The infographic illustrates research carried out by All Right?.
A PDF copy of a summary report of the research behind the All Right? wellbeing campaign for Canterbury. The report was created in April 2013, by Canterbury District Health Board, the Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand, and Healthy Christchurch.
An All Right? infographic designed for use as a web banner. The infographic asks a question beginning with 'What could you do', and gives three ideas for improving personal wellbeing.
A photograph of workers evaluating a crack in the footpath next to the Avon River.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 2 August 2013 entitled, "Drilling Deep".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 22 September 2011 entitled, "Steady on Stilts".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 9 November 2011 entitled, "Amuri Abandoned".
Data from the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence (CES) provides an unprecedented opportunity to assess and advance the current state of practice for evaluating liquefaction triggering. Towards this end, select case histories from the CES are used herein to assess the predictive capabilities of three alternative CPT-based simplified liquefaction evaluation procedures: Robertson and Wride (1998); Moss et al. (2006); and Idriss and Boulanger (2008). Additionally, the Liquefaction Potential Index (LPI) framework for predicting the severity of surficial liquefaction manifestations is also used to assess the predictive capabilities of the liquefaction evaluation procedures. Although it is not without limitations, use of the LPI framework for this purpose circumvents the need for selecting “critical” layers and their representative properties for study sites, which inherently involves subjectivity and thus has been a point of contention among researchers. It was found that while all the assessed liquefaction triggering evaluation procedures performed well for the parameter ranges of the sites analyzed, the procedure proposed by Idriss and Boulanger (2008) yielded predictions that are more consistent with field observations than the other procedures. However, use of the Idriss and Boulanger (2008) procedure in conjunction with a Christchurch-specific correlation to estimate fines content showed a decreased performance relative to using a generic fines content correlation. As a result, the fines correction for the Idriss and Boulanger (2008) procedure needs further study.
An All Right? infographic illustrating research carried out by All Right? about wellbeing in Canterbury, four years after the February 22 earthquake of 2011.
An All Right? infographic illustrating the Five Ways to Wellbeing.
The seismic response of unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings, in both their as-built or retrofitted configuration, is strongly dependent on the characteristics of wooden floors and, in particular, on their in-plane stiffness and on the quality of wall-to-floor connections. As part of the development of alternative performance-based retrofit strategies for URM buildings, experimental research has been carried out by the authors at the University of Canterbury, in order to distinguish the different elements contributing to the whole diaphragm's stiffness. The results have been compared to the ones predicted through the use of international guidelines in order to highlight shortcomings and qualities and to propose a simplified formulation for the evaluation of the stiffness properties.
Using case studies from the 2010-2011 Canterbury, New Zealand earthquake sequence, this study assesses the accuracies of paleoliquefaction back-analysis methods and explores the challenges, techniques, and uncertainties associated with their application. While liquefaction-based back-analyses have been widely used to estimate the magnitudes of paleoearthquakes, their uncertain efficacies continue to significantly affect the computed seismic hazard in regions where they are relied upon. Accordingly, their performance is evaluated herein using liquefaction data from modern earthquakes with known magnitudes. It is shown that when the earthquake source location and mechanism are known, back-analysis methods are capable of accurately deriving seismic parameters from liquefaction evidence. However, because the source location and mechanism are often unknown in paleoseismic studies, and because accurate interpretation is shown to be more difficult in such cases, new analysis techniques are proposed herein. An objective parameter is proposed to geospatially assess the likelihood of any provisional source location, enabling an analyst to more accurately estimate the magnitude of a liquefaction-inducing paleoearthquake. This study demonstrates the application of back-analysis methods, provides insight into their potential accuracies, and provides a framework for performing paleoliquefaction analyses worldwide.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 20 February 2013 entitled, "Drilling Deep".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 9 August 2011 entitled, "Sounding the Soil".
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 19 January 2013 entitled, "New Home".