Validation is an essential step to assess the applicability of simulated ground motions for utilization in engineering practice, and a comprehensive analysis should include both simple intensity measures (PGA, SA, etc), as well as the seismic response of a range of complex systems obtained by response history analysis. In order to enable a spectrum of complex structural systems to be considered in systematic validation of ground motion simulations in a routine fashion, an automated workflow was developed. Such a workflow enables validation of simulated ground motions in terms of different complex model responses by considering various ground motion sets and different ground motion simulation methods. The automated workflow converts the complex validation process into a routine one by providing a platform to perform the validation process promptly as a built-in process of simulation post-processing. As a case study, validation of simulated ground motions was investigated via the automated workflow by comparing the dynamic responses of three steel special moment frame (SMRF) subjected to the 40 observed and 40 simulated ground motions of 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. The seismic responses of the structures are principally quantified via the peak floor acceleration and maximum inter-storey drift ratio. Overall, the results indicate a general agreement in seismic demands obtained using the recorded and simulated ensembles of ground motions and provide further evidence that simulated ground motions can be used in code-based structural performance assessments in-place of, or in combination with, ensembles of recorded ground motions.
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 16 July 2013 entitled, "Holding up a mirror to the past...".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 8 February 2013 entitled, "Vote for me!".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 24 February 2014 entitled, "VIPs, flowers and hail".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 25 August 2014 entitled, "Tohoku 2011".
A story submitted by Rosie Belton to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Tara Ridge to the QuakeStories website.
Transcript of Pat Twiss's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Patricia Allan's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 31 December 2011 entitled, "2011 in review".
A story submitted by Joanna Orwin to the QuakeStories website.
Transcript of Andrea's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 22 February 2013
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 3 August 2012 entitled, "Scrap Basket Quilt Number Six".
An entry from Jennifer Middendorf's blog for 10 December 2011 entitled, "Here be sparkles".
A story submitted by Stephen Mateer to the QuakeStories website.
A story submitted by Louise to the QuakeStories website.
Transcript of Steve's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of participant number UC226AD's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Harry Kitkevics's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Matthew Hayman's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Guo Yang's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Amrinder Singh's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
Transcript of Moazzem Hossain's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 3 May 2013
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 23 August 2013
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 8 January 2013 entitled, "Venturing into the central city....".
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 10 February 2012
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 20 February 2012 entitled, "Looking back...".
A photograph captioned by BeckerFraserPhotos, "Damage to the Crichton Cobbers Youth and Community Club on Fitzgerald Avenue".