Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9928
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9954
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9947
Territorial authorities in New Zealand are responding to regulatory and market forces in the wake of the 2011 Christchurch earthquake to assess and retrofit buildings determined to be particularly vulnerable to earthquakes. Pending legislation may shorten the permissible timeframes on such seismic improvement programmes, but Auckland Council’s Property Department is already engaging in a proactive effort to assess its portfolio of approximately 3500 buildings, prioritise these assets for retrofit, and forecast construction costs for improvements. Within the programme structure, the following varied and often competing factors must be accommodated: * The council’s legal, fiscal, and ethical obligations to the people of Auckland per building regulations, health and safety protocols, and economic growth and urban development planning strategies; * The council’s functional priorities for service delivery; * Varied and numerous stakeholders across the largest territorial region in New Zealand in both population and landmass; * Heritage preservation and community and cultural values; and * Auckland’s prominent economic role in New Zealand’s economy which requires Auckland’s continued economic production post-disaster. Identifying those buildings most at risk to an earthquake in such a large and varied portfolio has warranted a rapid field assessment programme supplemented by strategically chosen detailed assessments. Furthermore, Auckland Council will benefit greatly in time and resources by choosing retrofit solutions, techniques, and technologies applicable to a large number of buildings with similar configurations and materials. From a research perspective, the number and variety of buildings within the council’s property portfolio will provide valuable data for risk modellers on building typologies in Auckland, which are expected to be fairly representative of the New Zealand building stock as a whole.
Observations in major earthquakes have shown that rockable structures suffered less to no damage. During rocking, that is, partial and temporary footing separations, the influx of seismic energy is interrupted and thus the impact of the base excitation is reduced. Rocking causes the structure to deform more rigid like. Consequently, the structure experiences less deformation along the height and thus a lower damage potential. Although many researchers have studied the influence of rockable footings, most of these are either analytical or numerical, and only a very few structures have been built with rockable footings worldwide, for example, the chimney at Christchurch Airport and the South Rangitikei Viaduct in New Zealand. Despite these studies, a thorough and understanding is not yet available, especially with respect to experimental validations. This work is the first to investigate the rocking behaviour of bridges with different slenderness using large‐scale shake table experiments. To limit the number of influence factors, a stiff footing support and the same fixed‐base fundamental frequency of the bridges were assumed. The result shows that the girder displacement and the footing rotation of the tall bridge do not always move in phase, which cannot be observed in the short bridge. The results demonstrate the important role of slenderness in the overall responses of rockable bridges. This behaviour cannot be observed in bridges with a commonly assumed fixed base since the slenderness effect cannot be activated.
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9930
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9925
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9951
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9937
Post February 22 Earthquake Damage Corner Opawa Road and Aynsley Terrace, Opawa PWS-2011-03-09-DSC9943
Pws-2010-09-23-dsc02646
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03498
Pws-2010-09-23-dsc02644
Pws-2010-09-23-dsc02643
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03495
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03460
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03459
Pws-2010-09-10-dsc02123
Pws-2010-09-10-dsc02126
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03503
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03501
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03505
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03478
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03462
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03497
PWS-2010-09-07-DSC01856
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03450
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03494
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03449
Pws-2010-10-05-dsc03496