Mackenzie and Willis building behind
This is still cordoned off and there was a fire since the quakes
As seen from Hereford St over the demolition of the corner buildings.
A new installation.
None
None
None
Just being finished.
None
Protected with bracing behind shipping containers
Ballantynes on Rt. Illusionist Artwork on side of over ramp
None
A temporary (5year) construction of giant cardboard tubes to be in use until the new or restored Christ Church Cathedral is back in the Square
There is one chair for each of the 185 people who lost their lives in the quakes
Looking towards Manchester St
None
None
This is in Madras St, The CTV building ws on the right far corner
None
Back towards the Square
from Gloucester St.
None
None
All that remains of the Theatre Royal plus the interior dome under plastic wrap at the back
Looking toward the hills
This will open up the street to the Avon River
None
None
None
New Zealand's devastating Canterbury earthquakes provided an opportunity to examine the efficacy of existing regulations and policies relevant to seismic strengthening of vulnerable buildings. The mixed-methods approach adopted, comprising both qualitative and quantitative approaches, revealed that some of the provisions in these regulations pose as constraints to appropriate strengthening of earthquake-prone buildings. Those provisions include the current seismic design philosophy, lack of mandatory disclosure of seismic risks and ineffective timeframes for strengthening vulnerable buildings. Recommendations arising from these research findings and implications for pre-disaster mitigation for future earthquake and Canterbury's post-disaster reconstruction suggest: (1) a reappraisal of the requirements for earthquake engineering design and construction, (2) a review and realignment of all regulatory frameworks relevant to earthquake risk mitigation, and (3) the need to develop a national programme necessary to achieve consistent mitigation efforts across the country. These recommendations are important in order to present a robust framework where New Zealand communities such as Christchurch can gradually recover after a major earthquake disaster, while planning for pre-disaster mitigation against future earthquakes. AM - Accepted Manuscript