8-pages Special devices can be used to minimize structural damage by energy dissipation or seismic isolation. This research considers High Force-to-Volume (HF2V), Symmetric Friction Connection (SFC), Asymmetric Friction Connection (AFC) and Linear-Elastic Isolators (LEI). Device architectures connecting column-to-deck and ground-to-deck are also compared. Bridge columns are assumed to remain elastic. Performance of bridge columns (peak and residual displacement) under 20 probabilistically scaled ground motions is assessed in spectral analysis (0.1-5.0sec) using reduction factors compared to a fixed, no-device case. Energy dissipating devices have minimum column displacement reduction factors when placed between the column and the deck for rigid connection system periods up to ~2.5s. Above that fundamental period, dissipating devices connecting ground-to-deck provide the optimum configuration. Residual displacements obtained when the energy dissipators are placed between the column and the deck are larger than those of the ground to deck case for periods below ~3.7s. Above this 3.7s, frictional dissipators in the column to deck case are more efficient, but HF2V devices connecting ground to deck remain as the best alternative with no residual displacements. The performance curves obtained in this research provide design guidelines for the best device and configuration applicable to a broad range of bridge structures.
8-pages Due to the extreme damage seen in several recent earthquakes, several passive energy dissipation devices have been developed with different mechanisms of energy dissipation. Response spectra analysis across multiple earthquake suites is used to investigate the reductions in structural response and base shear forces to probabilistically assess the impact of these devices using suites of ground motions from the SAC project. Single-degree-of-freedom spectral analysis structures are used with nonlinear models of the sliding hinge joint (SHJ) and HF2V devices. Reduction factors are computed for each device compared to a linear, no-device structure. Force capacity for SHJ and HF2V devices are equivalent. Results are presented as 5th, 25th, median (50th), 75th and 95th percentile responses at each period (0.1-5.0s by 0.1s increments). Both devices show significant reductions in displacement at all spectral periods of 30- 60% (at median). Both increase base shear forces. However, SHJ systems show both a broader 5-95th percentile range, as well as larger increases in base shear due to their different velocity dependence in dissipating energy. The results provide initial design trade-off information in a probabilistic, performance-based framework for these devices.
Paper 3408 The paper discusses modelling of cyclic stress-strain behaviour of soil, in particular a simple model that can produce a desired stiffness and hysteretic damping for a given strain level as observed in laboratory testing is formulated. The unloading-reloading relationship is developed for total stress seismic site response analysis with appropriate damping at large strain. The constitutive model employs a hyperbolic equation as the backbone curve, and uses a modification of the extended Masing unloading-reloading relationship leading to correct measured modulus reduction and damping curves simultaneously. A quasi-static cyclic loading of increasing amplitude is used to demonstrate the model’s performance and its capability to allow improved modelling of the magnitude of energy dissipation based on an experimental program on native sandy soils from Christchurch, New Zealand.
8-pages Viscous damping can be used to limit structural response due to seismic excitation. However, if large response velocities occur during an extreme seismic event such as a Maximum Considered Event (MCE), then significant damping forces can be created due to the damper velocity dependence. These damping forces are important as they must be resisted by the foundation, increasing design demand. Therefore, methods to predict and limit peak damping forces are important. To avoid the possibility of large foundation demands a yielding fuse can be used in series with the viscous damper to enable incorporation of large capacity viscous dampers to dissipate large amounts of energy during lower-level seismic events without inducing unacceptably high foundation demands during larger events. This paper delineates the impact of this approach in a probabilistic spectral design analysis using a suite of probabilistically scaled seismic events and a nonlinear model. Reduction factors versus a linear system with the same damper are calculated for base shear and displacement. A reduced sacrificial fuse yield force of 25% of the median base-shear force of the uncontrolled structure has only a small impact on displacement response, but can significantly reduce peak base-shear during extreme seismic events. The 95th percentile displacement reduction factors increase from 0.85 to 0.96 (small displacement reductions) but 95th percentile base-shear reduction factors decrease from 2.0 to 1.4, which is a significant reduction in peak foundation demand. This analysis clearly outlines the design tradeoffs and considerations for realistic structural design scenarios using added viscous damping.
