A document which outlines how to work safely around underground services, created to discuss with site staff at on-site "toolbox talks".
A document which outlines how to work safely in confined spaces, created to discuss with site staff at on-site "toolbox talks".
A document which outlines how to safely carry out lifting operations, created to discuss with site staff at on-site "toolbox talks".
A document which stipulates SCIRT's minimum standard for managing the risks arising from working around services.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 24 March 2012 entitled, "Seismic Squeaks".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 10 February 2012 entitled, "Thinking about February 22....".
A graphic promoting a discussion on press.co.nz of an article titled, "Rebuild at risk in new city plan".
An earthquake memories story from Warren Campbell-Trotter, Nurse Coordinator (Quality and Risk), Hillmorton Hospital, titled, "An earthquake experience".
A document which contains several examples of SCIRT Safety Alerts, which were documents sent out to inform and educate all site staff after an incident.
A document which outlines how to work safely in trenches and excavations, created to discuss with site staff at on-site "toolbox talks".
An entry from Deb Robertson's blog for 27 May 2013 entitled, "The Hottie Project 2013".
An entry from Roz Johnson's blog for 21 April 2012 entitled, "Demolition of a high story building in Christchurch".
A brochure created by Environment Canterbury, published in July 2007, covering tsunami risk to Canterbury and preparation for a tsunami.
A bowtie diagram which SCIRT used to evaluate the risks associated with and analyse the causal relationships associated with service strikes.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 26 May 2011 entitled, "Christchurch Conversations".
Summary of oral history interview with Ngaire Robertson about her experiences of the Canterbury earthquakes.
The "Lyttelton Review" newsletter for 10 December 2012, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.
A news item titled, "Lyttelton Tunnel", published on the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre's website on Thursday, 29 September 2011.
A document which outlines how to work safely with powered plant and tools, created to discuss with site staff at on-site "toolbox talks".
A story submitted by Rosie Belton to the QuakeStories website.
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 5 October 2011 entitled, "Drilling Down".
Transcript of Dennis Christensen's earthquake story, captured by the UC QuakeBox project.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 11 January 2013
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 6 October 2010 entitled, "Personal or Professional?".
An entry from Ruth Gardner's blog for 30 March 2012 entitled, "Going, going, gone".
A story submitted by Becky to the QuakeStories website.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 23 May 2014
A video of a presentation by Dr Erin Smith during the Community Resilience Stream of the 2016 People in Disasters Conference. The presentation is titled, "A Qualitative Study of Paramedic Duty to Treat During Disaster Response".The abstract for this presentation reads as follows: Disasters place unprecedented demands on emergency medical services and test paramedic personal commitment to the health care profession. Despite this challenge, legal guidelines, professional codes of ethics and ambulance service management guidelines are largely silent on the issue of professional obligations during disasters. They provide little to no guidance on what is expected of paramedics or how they ought to approach their duty to treat in the face of risk. This research explores how paramedics view their duty to treat during disasters. Reasons that may limit or override such a duty are examined. Understanding these issues is important in enabling paramedics to make informed and defensible decisions during disasters. The authors employed qualitative methods to gather Australian paramedic perspectives. Participants' views were analysed and organised according to three emerging themes: the scope of individual paramedic obligations, the role and obligations of ambulance services, and the broader ethical context. Our findings suggest that paramedic decisions around duty to treat will largely depend on their individual perception of risk and competing obligations. A reciprocal obligation is expected of paramedic employers. Ambulance services need to provide their employees with the best current information about risks in order to assist paramedics in making defensible decisions in difficult circumstances. Education plays a key role in providing paramedics with an understanding and appreciation of fundamental professional obligations by focusing attention on both the medical and ethical challenges involved with disaster response. Finally, codes of ethics might be useful, but ultimately paramedic decisions around professional obligations will largely depend on their individual risk assessment, perception of risk, and personal value systems.
A copy of the CanCERN online newsletter published on 20 June 2014
The "Lyttelton Harbour Review" newsletter for 4 February 2013, produced by the Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre.