Collection Overview: Liquefaction Studies
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
Collection Overview of 'Liquefaction Studies.'
Collection Overview of 'Liquefaction Studies.'
Object Overview of 'Fault mapping studies.'
Object Overview for 'Liquefaction Study Waimakariri District.'
Object Overview of 'Christchurch liquefaction study: Stage IV.'
Object Overview of 'Christchurch liquefaction study – Stage II (Beca, 2002).'
Object Overview of 'Christchurch liquefaction study – Stage 4a (Addendum Report) (Beca, 2005).'
Environment Canterbury's overview of their Regional Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment Studies.
This study analysed liquefaction susceptibility and estimated ground settlements for two earthquake scenarios (foothills and Alpine Fault) for eastern Waimakariri District. The report was later partially superseded by Earthquake hazard assessment for Waimakariri District (Yetton and McCahon, 2009), which while not using such detailed analytical methods as the 2000 Beca report, reviewed new information available since 2000 (including that collected as part of the Pegasus Town development). This showed that the liquefaction susceptibility in eastern Waimakariri district was in fact much more variable than suggested in the 2000 Beca maps, and that liquefaction susceptibility was extremely difficult to predict without a site-specific investigation. See Object Overview for background and usage information.
Object Overview of 'Hunter Hills Fault Zone study – Earthquake hazard assessment (Yetton, 2008).'
Object overview of "Earthquake risk assessment study Part 1 - Review of risk assessment methodologies and development of a draft risk assessment methodology for Christchurch".
Object Overview of 'Earthquake hazard and risk assessment study Stage 1 Part A: Earthquake source identification and characterisation'.
The Christchurch liquefaction study was initiated to better determine liquefaction susceptibility in Christchurch city. It aimed to improve on earlier liquefaction susceptibility maps, which were based on soil type and distribution, by incorporating soil strength data into liquefaction analysis. This stage of the study included collating available geological and geotechnical data from Environment Canterbury and Christchurch City Council into a database, modelling liquefaction hazard and ground damage and presenting these as maps. The report contains many recommendations, which were taken up in subsequent stages of the study. (Note that the results of Stage 1 of the Christchurch liquefaction study were provided to Environment Canterbury as a letter rather than a report. This was a summary of work completed to 30 June 2001, including a review of geological and geotechnical data available within Environment Canterbury and Christchurch City Council records.) See Object Overview for background and usage information.
Stage IV of the Christchurch liquefaction study updated the Stage II liquefaction hazard and ground damage maps with further data collected from other organisations, and included two additional maps indicating liquefaction sensitivity to groundwater levels. Stage IVa of the Christchurch liquefaction study used revised groundwater levels and adjustments to the liquefaction prediction algorithm. The outputs of the report were liquefaction hazard and ground damage maps for both average summer (low) and average winter (high) groundwater levels. The maps produced as part of Stage IVa of the report were subsequently included in an Environment Canterbury public education poster The Solid Facts on Christchurch Liquefaction which also contained information on how liquefaction occurs and what can be done to mitigate the liquefaction hazard. Stage IV of the Christchurch liquefaction study contained a number of recommendations to improve the liquefaction potential and ground damage maps for Christchurch. See Object Overview for background and usage information.
Page 7 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 16 January 2013.
Page 1 of the Go section of the Christchurch Press, published on Friday 18 January 2013.
Page 14 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 12 January 2013.
Page 17 of section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 September 2010.
Page 21 of section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 September 2010.
Page 8 of section G of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 25 September 2010.
Page 12 of the Escape section of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 27 September 2010.
Page 10 of the Escape section of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 27 September 2010.
Page 9 of the Escape section of the Christchurch Press, published on Monday 27 September 2010.
Page 9 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 29 September 2010.
Page 5 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 29 September 2010.
Page 7 of Section C of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 29 September 2010.
Page 14 of the Zest section of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 15 September 2010.
Page 15 of the Zest section of the Christchurch Press, published on Wednesday 15 September 2010.
Page 21 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.
Page 1 of Section A of the Christchurch Press, published on Thursday 16 September 2010.
Page 7 of Section E of the Christchurch Press, published on Saturday 31 January 2015.