Object Overview: Ashburton District engineering lifelines project- Earthqu…
Articles, UC QuakeStudies
Object Overview of 'Ashburton District engineering lifelines project: Earthquake hazard assessment'
Object Overview of 'Ashburton District engineering lifelines project: Earthquake hazard assessment'
Object Overview of 'General distribution and characteristics of active faults and folds in the Ashburton District, mid-Canterbury (Barrell and Strong, 2009).'
A PDF copy of a media release titled "World first campaign hits Ashburton". The media release features Kerry Marshall (CDHB) discussing the vision and scope of the All Right? campaign. The release is dated 8 May 2013.
This report describes the earthquake hazard in Ashburton district and gives details of historic earthquakes. It includes district-scale (1:250,000) active fault, ground shaking zone, liquefaction and landslide susceptibility maps. The report describes earthquake scenarios for a magnitude 7.0-7.3 earthquake on the Mt Hutt-Mt Peel Fault Zone and a magnitude 8 Alpine Fault earthquake. See Object Overview for background and usage information.
This report provides information on the locations and character of active geological faults and folds in Ashburton District. The faults are mapped at a district scale and the information is intended to highlight areas where there is a risk of permanent fault movement at the ground surface, and where more detailed investigations should be done if development is proposed in that area (depending on the potential activity of the fault and the type of development proposed). See Object Overview for background and usage information. Most of the faults and folds identified at the ground surface in Ashburton District are in rural or very sparsely populated areas. In addition, most of the faults have relatively long recurrence intervals (long-term average time between fault movements) in the order of several thousand years. Following the Ministry for the Environment Active Fault Guidelines, normal residential development would be allowed on or near faults with recurrence intervals this long. There are no recommendations associated with this report. The information in the report will be reviewed as required, after the remaining district reports are completed in the region.